Skin transplants: No more hard graft? | The Economist

Media_httpmediaeconom_htkdi

REPAIRING the skin of those who have been burned is a process of autotransplantation. First, the surgeon removes the scorched tissue from the affected area. Then he takes a patch of healthy skin from elsewhere on the patient’s body, stretches it to fit the affected area and, that done, fixes it to the wound with sutures, staples or glue. In the hands of a skilled operator such grafts are nearly always successful, but the process could surely be improved on.

That, at least, is the view of Jörg Gerlach of the University of Pittsburgh. And he—and, working separately, Fiona Wood, a plastic surgeon based in Perth, Australia—have therefore come up with a neat improvement: instead of grafting new skin to the burned area, they spray the new skin on.

The source of the spray-on skin is the same as that of a traditional graft—a piece of undamaged skin tissue from the patient in question. But once this tissue has been removed, the treatment is completely different. First, the excised skin is bathed in an enzyme solution that separates its cells from one another. Then, using a syringe or a pneumatic spray, the surgeon squirts the cells on to the wound. The whole process, including the separation of the cells, can be completed in 70-90 minutes (a traditional skin graft takes between ten minutes and an hour, depending on the size of the affected area), and the burns thereafter heal at the same rate as those which have received traditional grafts, recovering fully after 12-13 days.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s